Find a Lawyer

MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED versus ABDUL RAZZAK PATHAN

Sections 46, 47 (3) and 48 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O15 (3) (b) and (4) of the dismissal application on corruption charges. Court employees who served as cashiers at the Appeal Bank were dismissed after serving with charge sheets and questioning them on charges of mismanagement. Employees were accused of making money. Of the inquiry in which he participated, and after providing the opportunity, the evidence was regularly recorded. Cross-examination employees, who were dismissed from the job, filed a complaint with the employer after giving notice of the complaint to the Labor Court, accepted the grievance request against the dismissal and ordered their reinstatement in the Service Labor Court. Diya, however, was sentenced to one of the penalties for development deferment. Employees were properly considered to defend the allegations and their responses by the inquiry officer for a period of three years from the date when full development was granted to the employees. And the employees never asked for personal complaint requests and their affidavits according to the evidence, did not disclose that they were dismissed in connection with any dispute, nor did they claim to be related to their dismissal. Abuse and misconduct from any industrial dispute complaints requests filed by employees I have no permanent charge, stand against employees who misused money and use it as their own. online advocate from Silanwala lawyer