Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF versus STATE

There is no doubt that the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, and the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), the application of Articles 199 Constitutional Articles 5, 6 and 8, was prepared by the Police on the Punjab Prevention of Gambling Ordinance, 1978 site. The place where the applicant and others were accused of engaging in gambling was inside the applicant's house. This fact was further supported by the fact that the FIR of Section 5 of the Punjab Prevention of Gambling Ordinance 1978 was denied, as this section was only available in section 6 of the Prevention of Gambling Ordinance of Public Space, Street or Sports. Limited. The house, in the case of gambling in the room, was also excluded as raid in 1978, governed by the procedure provided in section 8 of this ordinance, which in the present case does not constitute raids by the complainant. That was completely infringed upon and ignored. If the mandatory provisions of sections 5, 6 and 8 of the Punjab Prevention Gambling Ordinance, 1979 have been stated that the FIR is allowed to continue, it will not only increase the harassment of the accused but also the law. There will also be abuse and abuse. Police case capable of interference by High Court advocate from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer