Find a Lawyer

GHULAM NABI versus JAM BASHIR AHMED, NAIB TEHSILDAR/REVENUE OFFICER

In this Constitution, petitioner, P&P has requested that the Respondent Revenue Officer be instructed to execute the decision passed earlier in the amendment in which his father was a Revenue Officer of the parties. He was instructed to consider the matter and to pass a proper legal order. By applying the procedure strictly to the applicant, the Revenue Officer, in fact, tried to obtain the records of the old modification contained in the Revenue Record if the applicant's request was not accepted by the Revenue Officer. A contempt of court petition was filed. The Revenue Officer has approved a legal order refusing to enter the dispute change entries in compliance with the order passed by the High Court; the criminal / contempt petition filed by the petitioner could not be further prosecuted. No order was passed in the litigation. As the applicant's father, revenue records may not be taxable and cannot be validated by the applicant unless the applicant's father and others have a special order declaring their right or title in the suit property. If the decree does not exist, this decree cannot be used which was filed earlier against the applicant's father and others. And the petitioner's father and others were executed because no order was passed in their favor, but the controversial order not only rejected the verdict but rejected the order while it was being implemented. Should be. An order will be approved in favor of the applicant Pakistan, top advocate family court from Narowal lawyer