Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus STATE

Section 302 (b) and 353 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), validation of the FIR definition immediately after the prosecution of section 7 (a), left no opportunity for any false involvement of the accused. , Who was in government office. And in another criminal case against the accused, the warrant of arrest against the accused went to serve arrest, was a natural witness, the said witnesses had no evil will against the accused and the accused had to be falsely implicated. There was no reason, they both said, that the witnesses were reliable, reliable and timely. The lengthy investigation that they encountered, their statements were unchanged, and the inconsistent evidence of the witnesses affected the conviction, and the two gave a momentary statement detailing the exact incident in which the investigating officer. Two types of pistol 30 bore were sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory and according to this report, 30 bore pistols were evacuated, blood-stained land was protected from the spot. This is because a medical report containing human blood stains showed that the stimulation of the calculation was clearly Was established, the minor contradictions in the statements of the prosecution witnesses were not serious, the defense of the accused was predicted, not convincing, the medical evidence and recovery with the help of the ocular account proved that The accused was the culprit with whom he was charged and the prosecutor successfully proved the case against the accused; in the circumstances the trial court was truly sentenced when best law firms from Quaidabad lawyer