Find a Lawyer

HABIB BANK LIMITED versus MUHAMMAD ASIF

Section 9, 19 and 22 suits, the decree suits filed by the bank for collection of loans were partially rejected by the banking tribunal, against which the order was regularly filed by the bank on the first I was told that the sum of Rs 2,11,000 was wrong and the decree was illegally denied (in the meantime, the creditors of the judgment had paid it and accordingly the banking court settled the execution request. Was granted, however, after the High Court remanded the matter to the relevant Banking Court, the appeal came up for hearing.) The banking court raised the issue and invalidated. Due to the validity of the case, which was present with the Banking Court, the execution request was dealt with, which was approved for the record due to the satisfaction of the order which was ignored. The banking court was concerned because of the bank's complaint that part of the claim, which was not decided, said that the appeal was remanded in the banking court case. To be heard and assessed by the banking court as to its merits, according to law, the banking court had clearly erred in dismissing the case because it was an unreasonable injunction, not sustained and regular. On the first appeal the remand order was approved, the parties were restored. According to the law, they were instructed to demand their presence / representation before the Banking Court for action in the suit. \ R \ n family advocate from South Wazirstan lawyer