Find a Lawyer

SYED BAQIR HUSSAIN SHAH versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI

Article 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Intra Court Appeals Respondents filed by the respondents were dismissed by the High Court; Intra Court appeals against the High Court decision were also dismissed, by the Single Judge. A directive issued by the defendant, the criminal and the single judge, recorded that the Board of Revenue had no jurisdiction to refer the matter, after the High Court verdict was reached, Appellant challenged the order / decision from the Supreme Court for advice on whether to implement the High Court decision. At first, but later withdrew from the one that was dealt with by the Supreme Court, however, the Supreme Court allowed the appellant to withdraw his request to refer to the Board of Revenue only to resolve his complaint. And said that no direction can be equated. Rejecting all the orders already approved by the High Court party, the decision was made to withdraw any fidelity at any time before any court with the option of alternative treatment and permission to withdraw. If they were approved, this would not mean that the prayer requested before the court was allowed. It was the final forum which, under the law, had to decide whether this person had any rights as well as his grievance redressal. The High Court's preliminary injunction was not set aside by the Supreme Court, it was still in the same field on which the single judge did not take any illegal action. Or file irregular and unexpected decisions law firms from Khoski lawyer