Find a Lawyer

AZIZ MUKHTAR AHMAD versus MADRISSA FAYYAZ-UL-QURAN THROUGH NAZIM

Claims for sections 12, 42 and 54 and a permanent injunction claiming that the land under the disputed house are part of their occupied territory claiming to have been owned by a The person had a sale to some other land, as well as to a shopkeeper, and said that the seller had sold the same one and eventually it was sold to the defendant on the basis of the approved variable and It was said that he had further defrauded defendant after the purchase. The plot, the boundary wall was erected as well as the construction of houses for the accommodation of its students, the trial court ruled that the plaintiff's suit with a permanent injunction was granted The lawsuit filed by the court was dismissed, but the decision and ruling passed by the trial court on filing an appeal against it, the appellate court passed the case to the trial court and the review order was filed against the defendants. Land acquired by the parties in the same dispute between the parties in relation to their respective shares Is about to be identified, which cannot be resolved without delimitation proceedings, only the course is open for fair / fair decision between the parties, the conditions presented in this case, both sides of the site plots identified. Which the appellate court had properly directed to be adopted by the appellate court, under these circumstances no unlawful interference / irregularity was committed in the revised jurisdiction of the High Court. famous supreme court advocate from Noorpur nooranga lawyer