Find a Lawyer

SHEIKH ZIA AKHTAR versus COUNTRY MANAGER COCA COLA BEVERAGES PAKISTAN LTD. AND 3 OTHERS

Sections 2 (XXX), 46 and 47 (3) Care of the dismissal of the service complaint \ Workman \, vowing to appeal the principles of dismissal of the High Court Appellant, dismissed his service. The complaint was filed against him. The complaint was dismissed by the Labor Court, unable to maintain its hold because the appellant was not a laborer and could not file a complaint. The appellant filed an appeal against the improper judgment of the trial because the Labor Court's decision was annulled because it was unsuccessful. To consider and consider the evidence of the parties, the results of the Labor Court were primarily influenced by the position assigned to the appellant in his appointment letter and confirmation letter, but other aspects of the matter, particularly the nature of the matter. Relative, failing to cope with its duties, its function; includes whether the appellant has the power to rent and fire. Or whether it is performing a supervisory or advisory duty so that in the absence of any express result of this impression, the Appellant cannot be excluded from the definition of `Worker Definition 'without notice. Its termination order and the procedure provided. The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968, allowed the appeal against the Labor Court decision, the decision was dismissed and the matter was remanded to the Labor Court, within a specified period. The same decision was made \ r \ n famous lower court advocate from Astore lawyer