Find a Lawyer

IMRAN ALIAS IMRANU versus STATE

On the statements of sections 302, 148, 149 and 109 eyewitnesses of the clauses, the four accused, who were assigned a similar role, were acquitted and no independent evidence was available against the accused. Had a close relationship. The defendant was located 300/400 yards from the scene, and the FIR reported that there was animosity between the witnesses of the complaining party and the accused prosecutor, in his statement before the trial. The dishonesty has improved. The presence of prosecution witnesses on the occasion was not without any doubt that the statements of both witnesses were denied by medical witnesses. The accused's case was similar to the case of the acquitted accused and his role cannot be distinguished, the prosecution's witnesses were declared unfounded. The lawsuit against the aforesaid co-accused was already excluded from the recovery of the pistol on the defendant's offer, the prosecution's case will not proceed because a derailment obtained the effect of recovery. Was accessible, no vacancies were found in the same way, the trial court's decision was set aside and the accused was acquitted of all charges and ordered to be released from jail. immigration advocates contact from Zhob lawyer