GAC PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. versus E.F.U. GENERAL INSURANCE LTD.
Injured by company judges under Section 2 (11), 7 and 316 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution of the Company Ordinance, 1984 to recover damages received from the company under section 316 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 Has been ordered, unless proceedings in this matter continue. At the same time, the civil court rejected the plea of the High Court to grant the permission of the Company Judge in the case of passing the order and terminating the companies in the case of the High Court Company Judge. Was handed over, but not by any means. The Second Court Civil Court should stop the proceedings in this case after taking notice of the order passed by the Company Judge, and the plaintiff has been asked to approach the Company Judge for permission to prosecute, which in a particular way is required by law. Need to do. Not done this way or with all citizens. The civil court could not prosecute the case, which was not invalid, the required permission of the company judge. The High Court accepted the constitutional request and retained the case while it was observed that the plaintiff returned to the company judge for permission to proceed with the principles. can do.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
