Sections 23, 6, 7 and 8 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 354, 109, 216 and 34 of the Terrorism Act, Qutel-e-Adm Transfer of the case from the Anti-Terrorism Court to the Court of General Jurisdiction was dismissed by the Special Court for the transfer of the accused's case, which was specifically proved to be a crime and the defendant's action The young boy was shot and killed automatically. The Weapons Minority Act created a sense of fear and insecurity and helplessness in the minds of ordinary people affecting the lives and tranquility of the general public and attracted the provisions of Section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997. And in their minds the effects of such terrorism on a large scale cannot be excluded from the jurisdiction of the Anti-Terrorism Court by the presence of personal enmity, nor is it intended and Nor is the commission intended to commission. The fence was related to the purpose of imposing jurisdiction over the Anti-Terrorism Court Act, while in the area of the accused there was a sense of helplessness and insecurity among the people where crime has been committed and the people are facing instability. Terrorism will fall under the jurisdiction of the court. The trial court's order did not face any material misconduct or illegal action and was retained
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
