Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAMEEL versus MUHAMMAD SALEEM

Section 42 Suit for Declaration of Property Containing a Shop and Residential Portion of Property Allotted to the Prior or Defendants But the Additional Settlement Commissioner, setting aside the allotment to the extent of the residential portion, the plaintiff sought the demand that The roof of the shop, which includes the residential section. It was transferred to its forefathers, so the defendants had no right to it, so the important questions were ownership and it was established on record that the allottee and subsequently the defendants disputed the shop and its roof. Were fun and enjoyable. The plaintiff, on the other hand, failed to prove his possession of any part of the shop or the use of its roof when the grounds of appeal established by his predecessor against the order of the Additional Settlement Commissioner show that he filed a petition. That the entire property consists of a shop and the house is completely independent of the shop and he confessed that the shop was in the possession of the defendant's residential part, that the evidence of separation and separation was in the possession of the predecessor's predecessor. That store was exclusively below the defendant's predecessor, below. Failing to note the material aspects of the case that were final for the purpose of determining the dispute between the parties and the decision to construct the roof, the plaintiff could not claim the roof. Shop law firms from Hayatabad lawyer