The testimony of section 302 (b) was provided by the son of ocular version motif, who was a prisoner of the house, his presence on this occasion cannot be doubted, the other witness of the prosecution, though neighbor and complainant. He had a friendly relationship with the accused, but no previous hostility or illicit desire will be expressed against the accused so that the false identity against him will be eliminated so the identity of the accused was not suspected as the accused was married to the complainant's sister. While the lantern was going on at the time of the incident, the housemates were chatting with each other. Both witnesses gave a consistent, coherent, natural and reliable account of the incident and their evidence was of intrinsic value, could not be substantiated during the investigation; the complainant had no time to recount the story. , Because the matter was reported to the police within two hours of the incident. At the police station, 10 km away, eyewitness statements were fully supported by medical evidence, no honorable reason is available on the killer's replacement record with an innocent person, nor is he The forensic science laboratory was sent to neither the vacant nor the recovered pistol, saying that the prosecution had successfully proved its case against the accused through molecular evidence, which was fully medical. With the help of the evidence and the circumstances of the case, such as filing an FIR without delay and motive, the trial court acquitted the accused. Was properly punished and sentenced, in the absence of any mitigating circumstances in favor of the accused,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
