Find a Lawyer

MIR HASSAN versus STATE

Section 9 (c) and 25 Criminal Code (v. 1898), complimenting Section 103 testimony, were recovered from a motor vehicle bonnet driven by the accused, according to which 103 kg of heroin was recovered from the accused. Another item was recovered. The provisions of section 25 of the Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1997 and the special law provisions specifically exclude the application of $ 103, the PC police personnel were competent witnesses and their testimony was merely excluded. Couldn't have been that they were policemen. Given the evidence, the testimony of the excise officers was as good as the report by the chemical analyst of the private witnesses regarding the substance transmitted to him by the prosecution's witness, in the circumstances. Brought enough material to the record to be charged with the commission of the crime and consequently the appeal of the crime was dropped inheritance advocates near Cherat lawyer