Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SAHABZADA KAMRAN AHMAD versus S.H.O., SATELLITE TOWN, SARGODHA


The removal of sections 199 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Articles 420, 468 and 471 FIR was registered by police as per law. This case was not intended to turn a civil dispute into a criminal liability, but the facts and circumstances had excluded the commission of criminal offenses by the applicants. , The High Court could not control or interfere because the investigating agency was a prima facie investigation, and the facts of the case did not reveal whether the allegations made by the defendant / complainant in the FIR were baseless or corrupt. Were not against the people. Failed to file a case for termination of FIR, Constitutional plea dismissed without merit

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Kot Addu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.