Sections 15 and 22 of Convention (Article 10 of 1984), Article 129 (f) Sale of mortgaged property without the court's intervention Legal notices, Requirements for courier receipt regulations) Financial Institutions (Tax recovery) Ordinance 2001 not issued Was done, the courier company should have been more careful in maintaining the collection bank through which the second controversial notice was sent, especially when seizing the powers under section 15 (4). The Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance, 2001 is dependent on the completion of Section 15 (2) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance, 2001 The abolition of such collection may be the reason for establishing only one presumption. The idea produced by the judge was hypocritical. The High Court Bank did not present a postal receipt or courier receipt to enable the court to enforce Article 129 of the Martyrdom Act 1984. Such a letter was published on the assumption and assumption letter, and also in respect of the special law, the financial institutions (restoration of finance) Ordinance 2001, whose provisions were compulsory and thus after any departure. All instances of will be declared invalid. The question of the second and third notices did not arise at least at the interrelated stage; therefore, the powers under section 15 (4) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001 were not transferred to the bank and therefore Were not available to the bank. In a special High Court appeal, the Division Bench of the High Court upheld an order passed by a single judge and the auction of the property under consideration was declared invalid because the appeal was allowed.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
