Sections 497, 337, 337F (ii) and 504 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) appeal against evil principles with the intent to deliberately offend, as a result of adult, schizophrenia, asthma. The suspect's benefit of the affirmation was closely linked to the testimony of the complainant and the prosecution, although they hid the enmity with the accused, but verbal confirmation of the civil suit, and documentary evidence, showed that the complainant And the suspects were on contentious terms about agricultural land, hostility and hatred against the accused, their evidence of interest, careful and careful scrutiny. Investigations were to be made, under the circumstances, of the occurrence of free sovereignty in a densely populated area once a day, but no one from that area was cited or examined as a prosecution witness. The investigation was carried out when there were major contradictions in the case, lacking independent sovereignty, based on evidence from the prosecutor's witness, who suspected the entire trial case, only 10 days after the accident. Nor did the investigating officer see that the memorandum of the wound had been prepared on the complainant's offer. Hiding the injured and registering a counter-claim by the complainant adversely affected his credibility, and his evidence was not affected by the credibility. The contradictions affected the credibility of the eyewitnesses and the prosecution's case was questionable. Created doubts. The evidence was also contradictory; the possession of the accused had no effect on the recovery of the property or arms used in the crime. The culprits who fell in their favor
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
