SYED AKBAR ALI versus MAMUN ALI BUMASAK (PVT.) LTD.
Section 17 and 24 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 181, the Controller of Additional Hire granted the High Court and the Supreme Court tenant's request for Section 12 (2). Maintained under. ), CPC filed on September 6, 2009 to set aside the withdrawal order dated 6 2005, under which the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal for appeal on 4 1 2006 after its application was dismissed. The request for restriction and maintainability was rejected by the Source Additional Rent Controller. Such a request regarding a fraudulent contract and the landlord and tenant relationship was already raised in response to a written request from the aggrieved tenant and the tenant controller to allow the parties to present evidence and After their hearing, it was decided that it was finalized after the tenants were dismissed. The petition by the landlord of the Supreme Court had taken possession of the demolition shop four (4) years prior to the filing of such application by the tenant as per Article 181 of the Limitation Act 1908 , If calculated from the date of the order of discharge or the order of the Supreme Court, the High Court had already dismissed the appeal upon expiration.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
