DAYS INN WORLDWIDE INC. THROUGH AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY versus HOTEL GALAXY (PVT.) LIMITED
Sections 73 & A 74A Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XXXXX, RR 1 & 2 Plaintiffs filed an application under O XXXIX, Rr 1 & 2, CPC filed the trade and service against the plaintiff. Marksday sought an order to stop using them. The Sunburst logo was claimed to be the owner of the aforementioned mark and under the same mark and logo, it promotes similar businesses worldwide. The plaintiff was the owner and owner of the trademark and service mark as a confession, and there was no final agreement between the parties. Defendants were allowed to restrain the use of trademarks and service marks, subject to submission to the court Nazir within a specified period of time when the order was given by the court when the defendant's lawyer stated that the defendant Ali has invested a large sum of money, benefiting from the treatment of the appellate High Court observed that the application of the order will remain suspended for 30 days so as to enable the defendant to seek treatment through appeal. If lawful
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer