Find a Lawyer

PORT QASIM AUTHORITY, A STATUTORY BODY HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT BIN QASIM, KARACHI versus OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE OF KARACHI AND OTHERS

Sections 3 (2) and 4 (4) of the Port Qasim Authority Act (XLIII of 1973), Section 23 Scale B No 04 (KE) / 2005 dated 12 5 2005 and Section R No. 72 (KE) / 96 dated 2 5 Under the High Court Port Authority's jurisdiction, in 1996, the Sindh Chief Court Rules (R section) R 731 brought six cases, including the Port Authority, against the competing claimants for failure of the Authority to grant preliminary claims against the competing claimants. In the High Court Admiralty jurisdiction in which the defendants raised their claims against the arrested ship and were then sold by a Government Assistant, the buyer paid the full sale price to the Government Assistant and the ship was delivered on 1 2 2000. ? And the charges should be prioritized over all other claims, and since there was a claim of authority over the proceeds of the sale of the ship, there was nothing left to distribute to the other five contenders, even if they did If established, the remaining five claimants against the ship claim that the suit filed by the authority was not for the arrest of the ship, so their case will not be considered as a case under the High Court Admiralty Jurisdiction. The authority's claim did not benefit from any preference. Competing claimants; that no clause 3 (2) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction High Court Ordinance 1980 was filed on the authority's claim. As a legal entity under the Port Qasim Authority Act 1973, it was granted alternative treatment for filing a case under section 23 of the Port Qasim Authority Act 1973 and, after abandoning such a remedy, was passed in the present case. Like any other decree to be executed top civil advocates from Daulat Pur lawyer