Find a Lawyer

PRTC versus MAHMOOD AHMAD

Sections 46 and 48 of the Prosecution Complaint Request from the High Court respondents, who were appointed as foremen, claimed that they were entitled to be promoted as Assistant Works Manager under Staff Promotion Rules 1959, Instead, the appellant was only charged with assistant works. The manager respondents alleged that their juniors had been promoted, but despite being senior, they were not considered for promotion or were informed of the reasons for their superannuation, Respondent's request for a complaint approved by the Labor Court was filed by the employer in the High Court against the Labor Court verdict, though his cadre was the most employed, but he was under matriculation. The primary qualification for development as an Assistant Works Manager, under Staff Promotion Rules 1976, was the matrix respondents who qualified according to the rules was not. Assigning the position of Assistant Works Manager to a particular position cannot be justified. Responding to the prevailing rules and regulations, the respondent claimed that he was justified in claiming progress on the grounds that the juniors were eligible. Were not, they were promoted, two errors would not accept a correct appeal, the unacceptable labor court-approved order was held by the High Court with the result that the complaint filed by the respondent was dismissed. Was lawer from fb area from Akhora Khattak lawyer