Find a Lawyer

SHAHBAZ versus STATE

Article 302 (b) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Definition of Section 103 Evidence Joint Recovery Memo During the investigation of the absence of independent witnesses, no crime was recovered from the scene of the incident and arms recovered from both the accused were seized. Such weapons were not sent to the forensic science laboratory through a joint rehabilitation memo and no special injury was inflicted on any of the accused, and the injured prosecution's witness was not presented to the Investigation Officer. Nor was one accused acquitted in the trial before the trial court, while the other was sentenced Was gone And they were sentenced to life imprisonment; no independent witnesses from the area authorized by the trial court were affiliated with the proceedings, though, according to prosecutor's testimony, there were several people in the area, recovering a joint weapon. Was recovered because it was used by a crime weapon. The suspect was also recovered from the same room, but Erenstein chestnut, allegedly recovered from the suspect, was not sent to the forensic science lab to seek expert opinion, therefore, it is without any doubt. Except that the prosecution had failed to prove the facts of the recovery from the accused, the prosecution withheld the best evidence from not appearing in the FIR without disclosing any reason for the alleged injury. None of the three designated and four unidentified suspects were charged with any particular injury, nor were any crimes committed. The alley was secured from the premises and no bullet was recovered top advocate from FR Peshawar lawyer