AHMAD HAYAT versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA
Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal suit, both family court and appellate court reimbursement of their son's maintenance allowance on the applicant for Rs. 10,000 per month. Was planted. The court's unanimous decisions and orders were challenged to counter the amount of restitution set by the courts, and it was said that the courts had no jurisdiction to provide for the last restoration. He could not prove that he had just gone abroad for pre-education and was not working there that the applicant claims that he was to retain his second wife. He has enough resources to pay restitution allowance through the courts. The petitioner cited in support of the claimant of the provisions of the legal rule. This time maintenance8888, through the CCPC, could not be awarded the previous restitution or previous allowance by the Family Court, the High Court Constitution. There was no case of interference in the jurisdiction, otherwise, there could be a legal decision within the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction, not be substituted on a constitutional request.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
