Find a Lawyer

NAJMA KAUSAR versus CITIBANK N.A. THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER/PRINCIPAL OFFICER

Sections 9 and 22 Applicant for Sale of Loan Debt Following the decision of the suit filed by the respondent objecting to the sale of the mortgaged property, the appellant was ordered to sell the mortgaged property. An objection was placed on a sale that was excluded. The Executive Court Respondent Bank was requested to present the original documents related to the suit property mortgage, but failed to comply, despite repeated calls and no one on the due date for the hearing for the respondent bank. Not demanded, the bank's appellant's action against the former Parliament was that it was a clear buyer of the mortgaged property and said the property was mortgaged by another bank. It said that after making a registered contract with the property owner, it said that the debt was cleared and the bank reported the payment to the authority and upon dismissing such charge, the appellant further claimed that there was a private The person stated that the order against the sale was obtained by the court, which was eventually vacated by the court and the authority had influenced the change of property in his record to the said property and filed an appeal by the appellant. Permission was granted and consequently the order was set aside that the objection filed by the appellant be similar to that of the Judge Banking Court. Money will be considered pending. The rulers will ask the holder bank for a response on the appropriate issues and decide the matter after recording the evidence of the parties within the stipulated period. power of attorney advocate Kallur Kot lawyer