A.S. NADEEM ADVERTISERS, LAHORE versus PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR
A XIV, R 5, O VII, R 2 and Section 141 Money Suite Structure of Correct Matters First Duty Exclusion of the First Appeal Court is not obliged to file a second application for the formation of the case by the composition of the scope of the respondent / applicant. Not satisfied, the respondent withdrew the application for the formation of pending cases for ten years and filed another petition, which was rejected by the trial court. The primary responsibility of the court was to determine the correct / appropriate issues arising from the parties' request. O XIV, defendant's first application under R 5, cannot be treated as a second request repeatedly, section 141, exclusive of compiling, modifying, or framework for additional CPC jurisdiction A trial court may request and the parties may take action against it. The mere identification of errors in it, the dismissal of the first respondent's request for correction of matters cannot be construed as a limitation on the application of jurisdiction by the trial court A. In this way their application was wrongly dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
