MUHAMMAD TAHIR versus KHANAN
Sections 5 and 24 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 38 and OX, R14 pre-emptive decree implementing court's authority with the former impeachment suit costing the court ordered by it Instructions for deposit were paid on time but the failure to pay the price resulted in the execution of the court and the case dismissed, premature recording of the order clearly indicated The dismissal of the case was due to the failure to pay premature costs in just two weeks and not the cost. No timeline was ever set, therefore, the trial court had to be strictly enforced and enforced, complying with the provisions of OX, R14, CPC and if there had been any error in the matter. In the proper injunction drawing by the court, no prejudice can be attributed to the plaintiff. The court may refuse to enforce the order, but the court did not have the authority to dismiss the case by hanging and, therefore, had no justification. Disclaimer
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Kurram Agency lawyer