SAHIBZADA MUHAMMAD NAZEER SULTAN versus SAIMA AKHTAR BHARWANA
Sections 7 (4), 39 (3), 52, 67 and 70 (a) Representation of the People (Holding of Elections) Rules, 1977, R 26 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 218 Election Disputes Exempt from Belt Papers ? The complaint that the examination and re-counting had been completely annulled was that the election was not done in accordance with the law and the presiding officers' provisions, and that the returning officer had failed to perform his duties, the returning officer admitted. Did the applicant make a request that was rejected? On the same day, the Presiding Officer Returning Officer, without inspecting and inspecting the counted ballot papers, also admitted that he did not open or de-seal any packets / bags produced by the Presiding Officers, which would strengthen the results. Before that it had an impact. Counting, the Returning Officer has to check the ballot papers excluded from the count by the Presiding Officers and reach their conclusion so that in case of accuracy or someone else they have declared an exception to the Public Representation Act 1976 Section 7 (4) was strictly adhered to in accordance with the legal provisions in the conduct and conduct of the Returning Officer. To do all the work and work as it may necessary to effectively hold the elections in accordance with the provisions of the law and rules, appoint the Returning Officer in accordance with Article 218 of the Constitution Period in an honest, fair, fair and lawful manner. Was. And the violations made by the Returning Officer were very serious and the scope and the scope of the parties' requests.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Jhang lawyer