The suit for the specific performance of the Section 12 agreement was not proved by the plaintiffs because none of their minor testimony was examined by the plaintiff, no attempt was made to prove the testimony by a minor witness who was allegedly involved. Had died The minor witness who was alive was not presented. If the aforesaid witness was allegedly unnecessary to the plaintiffs because of the litigation between them, he would not refrain from presenting the plaintiff as a court witness and in his signature. In the event of failure to be the owner, the witnesses could also resort to other means to prove the defendant, in the absence of any minor witness and other evidence of the plaintiff failed to prove the seller's contract. In the event that the plaintiff failed to exclude the position of evidence placed on them, the sale agreement was executed. Subsequently, the suit could not be decided, due to the court present below for the improper interpretation against the defendant, the completely inadmissible suit filed by the defendants was completely excluded.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
