ABDUL RASHID versus MST. KAUSAR PARVEEN
A IX, R 9 and Section 11 Res Judiciary, the principle of significant controversy was brought to the High Court in a constitutional jurisdiction that, although not approved by the applicants in the constitutional jurisdiction, should be ignored. Because filing a constitutional petition was wrong, the counsel's erroneous action cannot be protected because the import and its effect cannot be ignored. The same case was tried before a civil court. Which was earlier challenged in the constitutional petition and the final decision on the decision. , Was fully attracted to the present case and barred the applicants from taking such a petition and prevented the civil court from ignoring and disregarding the order issued by the High Court which became the final decision of the parties.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Kohlu lawyer
