Find a Lawyer

KHALID IQBAL versus STATE

Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), the application for the cancellation of Section 379 bail was granted to the guarantors / accused on the basis that there was a delay of 7/8 months in filing the FIR. The name of the father of the main accused whose bail was rejected by the same order was not mentioned in the petition submitted by the applicant / complainant for registration of this case and also that for the purpose of fraudulent purposes. Because of that they may be involved by the complainant. The respondent / accused was against the son. The court did not commit any unlawful proceedings because the conclusions drawn could not be termed as unrealistic, even otherwise the approval and cancellation of the bail was reasonable and The applicant's lawyer, (complainant) could not identify it. Any unlawful, irregular, corrupt or arbitrary order of the court under which the applicant's intervention in the High Court case was not required by the respondent / accused after the grant of bail Misused privileges, in which case the request for cancellation of bail was dismissed advocate from Karore Lalisan lawyer