Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YASEEN versus STATE

Section 2 30b (b) definition of evidence was immediately filed in the FIR, in which the accused's name was regularly mentioned as an accused Medical evidence fully supported the ocular account and medical evidence. There was no contradiction, and the complainant, who was the father of the deceased at the time of the occurrence of the firearm used in the prosecution story related to the time and nature, cannot be doubted that the complainant The deceased's father was a natural witness and his close relationship with the deceased was not enough to declare him as an interested witness. The previous unlawful desire, rivalry or malice among the parties did not exist, although the prosecution's witness was an occasional witness, but he was a resident of the same area and his house was located 20/20 in the same square. At the scene of the incident, the 25 complainant had successfully passed the cross-examination examination and due to false discrimination the defense failed to obtain some of the accused after the prosecution had left the prosecution witness. Regarding the time, place and manner in which the police came up with the prior statement made to the quality nor the amount of evidence to be seen in criminal cases. Based on the witness's sole statement, if it is credible, there is no reason to reject the complainant's statement, which is credible and credible, as well as to the accused through an independent piece of evidence. Not enough to connect with the commission of the crime. The accused's apprehended action for a year about his involvement in the incident ask a advocate free from Gharo lawyer