MUHAMMAD HASSAN versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE
The lawsuit filed by pre-testimony of section & pre 13 testimony suits the trial court and the Court of Appeal heard controversially before the first importer's testimony regarding the source of the information in question, Was more relevant. The testimony of the prophetic word was formally taken by both the courts as evidence of their own testimony in relation to prejudice; the credibility was not credible; There was no other evidence to do so. Act, 1991 The two courts, in exercising their jurisdiction, committed unlawful and material irregularities, contradictory concurrent decisions, the suit filed by the prior umpire, was dismissed,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Kohlu lawyer
