Find a Lawyer

SARFRAZ AHMAD TARAR versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE

Article 3 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Appointment of Ombudsman Qualifications (2) Expression of the Punjab Office of Ombuds Act, 1997 \ or any other person of unknown integrity ope scope petitioner has been challenged by Ombudsman Punjab. The appointment of the defendant on the basis that on the basis of section 3 (2) of section 3 of section 3 of the Ombudsman Act, only the person qualified to be a High Court Judge or a High Court Judge was to be appointed Ombudsman. Effective 1997, the person of known or otherwise prominent integrity, and the amendment to section 3 (2) of the Act were greatly enhanced, justifying the constitution of section 3 (2) of the Punjab Office of the Ombudsman Act 1997 Scope was expanded. Through amendments to enable the government to appoint an Ombudsman besides a Superior Court Judge. There was no need to be controversial about being called upon to amend a law enforced by any other known integrity or the ability of another well-known integrity / provincial legislature, nor was it shown Was barred, which was not entirely and exclusively a judicial nature of any section of the Constitution executed by the Ombudsman. Depending on your management experience, working as a public servant with integrity may also be particularly appropriate for the said office. Constructing any restriction of an amended provision means, that only a person with judicial information can be appointed an Ombudsman, not only to defeat the purpose of the legislature, but to have the same sentence - another person less. Think of it as meaningless and autos. Every word of the Constitution deserves to be given its meaning and any part of it is worthless best advocate from Khanewal lawyer