SARFRAZ AHMAD TARAR versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE
Article 3 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Appointment of Ombudsman Qualifications (2) Expression of the Punjab Office of Ombuds Act, 1997 \ or any other person of unknown integrity ope scope petitioner has been challenged by Ombudsman Punjab. The appointment of the defendant on the basis that on the basis of section 3 (2) of section 3 of section 3 of the Ombudsman Act, only the person qualified to be a High Court Judge or a High Court Judge was to be appointed Ombudsman. Effective 1997, the person of known or otherwise prominent integrity, and the amendment to section 3 (2) of the Act were greatly enhanced, justifying the constitution of section 3 (2) of the Punjab Office of the Ombudsman Act 1997 Scope was expanded. Through amendments to enable the government to appoint an Ombudsman besides a Superior Court Judge. There was no need to be controversial about being called upon to amend a law enforced by any other known integrity or the ability of another well-known integrity / provincial legislature, nor was it shown Was barred, which was not entirely and exclusively a judicial nature of any section of the Constitution executed by the Ombudsman. Depending on your management experience, working as a public servant with integrity may also be particularly appropriate for the said office. Constructing any restriction of an amended provision means, that only a person with judicial information can be appointed an Ombudsman, not only to defeat the purpose of the legislature, but to have the same sentence - another person less. Think of it as meaningless and autos. Every word of the Constitution deserves to be given its meaning and any part of it is worthless
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
