SAROSH M. CHALLA versus ABDUL RASHID
On the basis of section 17 (2) (i) (iv) and 24 rent payments, the tenant's dismissal and the removal of the appeal from the High Court to the High Court were dismissed by the Rent Controller, demanding that the payment of the rent. I have neither proved to be a halt nor a problem. The record shows that the tenant was submitting the rent to the court with the permission of the rent controller when the rent controller had allowed the rent to be submitted to the court, as per the law, if it was forbidden by the tender of the rent Is quite compliant. Due to some misconduct, the tenant had submitted the rent at an increased rate for a specific period, and then the original rent would be resorted to; this does not mean that the tenant has taken over the rent. The tenant had rightly decided that the tenant had not committed a default crime in paying the rent. Appeal against the rent controller's decision was not proved.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Panjan Kisan lawyer
