Find a Lawyer

MAZHAR HUSSAIN versus STATE

Definitions of Articles 302 and 324/34 were filed with the FIR reasonably fast and the accused was specifically designated as the original perpetrator of the alleged crime established in the FIR under Section 342, CR P. In his statement under C, the accused confessed that the time of family enmity between the parties on account of landed property was such that all these witnesses were generally expected to be present at home. It was said that two witnesses of the prosecution had identified injuries on their persons to confirm their presence during the incident in question. Had made permanent statements before the trial court on important cases and had no clear reason to falsely implicate the accused in the natural-party case or else related to the false allegations of the accused in this case. Relationships were quite remote The date and time of the medical evidence were confirmed, the weapon used by the suspect, the location of the injuries caused by the suspect and the direction to shoot him, eyewitnesses said. There is a slight difference between the locations of some of the wounds described by these witnesses. Medical evidence in the definitive cumulative evaluation, during which the ocular account presented in this case proved to be quite helpful, found 12 bore guns recovered from the possession of the accused and twelve crime blanks were recovered from the scene of the incident. A gun was recovered from the occupation of the Ocular Account, along with three injured witnesses, along with three eyewitnesses. All the natural witnesses received considerable co-ordination from this purpose and recovery and best advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer