MUHAMMAD ASLAM JAVED versus UNITED BANK LTD. CIRCLE OFFICE, FAISALABAD THROUGH CIRCLE EXECUTIVE
The appeal of the Section 25A Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 2A & 6's appeal was restored by the Labor Court appealed before the wrong forum, but the appeal moved to the Tribunal before the Labor Appellate Tribunal. Was done The High Court, which was adopted by the employees in favor of the bank on 8-4 2005, was that during the appeal hearing, Section 2A of the High Court was entered into the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, and the only service The tribunal had jurisdiction to hear this appeal. All appeals before the other forums remain valid, the justification provided to the relevant parties was available in the provision of section 6 (2) of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, in which the service tribunal was 90 before the bank's applicant. Appeal was allowed for a period of days, within days ???? did not request jurisdiction of the service tribunal and even then the High Court decided an appeal which had never existed before and which It had long since collapsed. Earlier, no cause was considered pending before the High Court for contempt. The High Court had neither the jurisdiction to decide the matter nor any matter pending before the Supreme Court to change the application for leave to appeal and set aside. The decision passed by the High Court of Appeal was allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
