Find a Lawyer

NIZAMUDDIN versus MST. SIDDIQUE BEGUM

Article 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The effect of the present findings of the facts given by the courts regarding the personal necessity of ownership of the land of Luckland against Landlord on the basis of a request for eviction It was filed that the tenant's shop was necessary for his son, given his personal need. Since the latter (the landlord's son) had retired from bank service and wanted to set up some business for his mother's livelihood, the rent controller on the three sisters allowed the application and then filed the appeal in a constitutional petition. District Court High Court dismissed. Tenants learn about lower courts. Tenants primarily claim that personally-needed property was not proven to some extent because they did not disclose the nature of the business at the grocery store. It was beyond any doubt that a landlord shop was needed for the landlord's personal needs. The son, who had retired from bank service, wanted to run his business. The tenant failed to state that the following The conclusions obtained by the courts regarding the harmony of fact are the result of misreading or non-reading of evidence or the High Court, while affirming that it has committed an unlawful calling, appealed to the Supreme Court for leave to appeal. Excluded for intervention \ r \ n top advocates from Panjan Kisan lawyer