Find a Lawyer

SHAJAR ISLAM versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE

Sections 2 (c) and 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Consideration of Tenancy Rules The landlord-determined tenant HC, under the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, set aside conclusions regarding the harmony of the two courts. And dismissed the dismissal request on the ground that there was no written contract of tenancy between the parties. It has always been a factor in establishing a landlord and tenant relationship between the parties. Under normal circumstances, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the owner of the property will be considered the landlord and the premises owner will be, because of his title. Tenancy is not required by law to be a tenant was created by a written instrument through express terms, but also for the oral and impugned High Court in exercising its constitutional jurisdiction over the controversial question of fact based on evidence. There was no need to interfere with the results obtained, even though such an investigation is subject to judicial review. In such cases, under Article 199 of the Constitution, the evidence of the High Court was limited to misreading or non-reading or if any evidence was based on any evidence which could lead to misunderstanding of justice: it is appropriate for the High Court. Was not to interfere with his search. The fact is that by re-evaluation of the evidence in the constitutional jurisdiction or by the courts relating to the existence of the landlord and tenant relationship between the parties, the jurisdiction may in fact be modified or appealed in any matter. Use was outside its scope. The Supreme Court upheld the jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution when you need a advocate from Karachi lawyer