Find a Lawyer

HAFIZ HAMDULLAH versus SAIFULLAH KHAN

Sections 14, 52 and 99 (1) (a) (k) of the General Election Order (7 of 2002), Arts 8D (2) (A) and 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 63 (2) , 199 (1) (b) (ii) and 225 Written by the Provincial Assembly Disqualification Tendering papers for resignation from the civil service Appellant submitted his resignation on the relevant dates on 3 11 1999 He resigned on 13 11 2003, and was elected to the Provincial Assembly. The selection of the appellant under the jurisdiction under Article 199 (1) (b) (II) of the Constitution was decided by the High Court on the ground that it did not ban it. Become a civil servant two years before the election. The ploy taken by the appellant was that his resignation would be immediately accepted on his tender, which would relieve his disability. Appointments and governance were made under the appointments of public / civil servants. The terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties involved in the rules and appointment letter / notification made under the Civil Servants Act, 1973 were the result of a mutual agreement between him and the government and the employee As a result of a bilateral agreement between him and the government, the unilateral action would be operative or effective for a government / public servant to relinquish his right in relation to an office / office unless accepted by the competent authority when the appellant. If he resigns and is notified to the competent authority on 3 11 1999, he will be accepted on 11 11 2003 Or was he, therefore, continued to be a public / civil servant until 13 11 2003, resignation by a government employee, resignation authority? attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Dudial lawyer