Find a Lawyer

RAMZAN versus AKHTAR HAYAT

Section 337F (i) / 337F (ii) / 148/149 Pakistan Occupation Tuition (1973), Article 199 Constitution Session After the court recorded in its review jurisdiction, the private complaint sought all the accused involved in the legitimate magistrate. Was instructed to do. In preliminary evidence in the private complaint filed against the twelve, only three persons were summoned to trial, to whom the special role was assigned, and under the use of this amended jurisdiction, the remaining accused were sent to the sessions court. The complaint was excluded to the extent of the order designated by. Rejecting the said order, directing all twelve defendants to stand trial, failing to understand that the prosecution's witnesses fully and permanently conveyed all the suspects to their alleged role in a private complaint. Those involved, who were prosecuted. The trial court, based on the evidence, had properly summoned all the accused at this stage as there was no distance. The stylish features of the sessions court were equally competent to decide the matter and they could be different from the opinion of the magistrate in the amending jurisdiction to prosecute the accused. Accordingly, the constitutional petition was dismissed. ? criminal advocate from Lahore lawyer