GHULAM MUSTAFA versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ ALIAS FAROOQI
Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), 5 302/34 bail, the cancellation of the Additional Sessions Judge to make an exception for the defendant's post-arrest bail without knowing himself of the previous order passed by his predecessor. Action. The accused Additional Sessions Judge also lost sight of the fact that he had been shown gross misconduct with him on the basis of his weight, prior to his approval of the bail, in which the accused was granted bail. He was overweight with the Additional Sessions Judge. During the investigation, he was acquitted, even available to the accused when his previous bail application was rejected, the Additional Sessions Judge forgetting that he himself had been charged under Sections 302 and 34 The accused was indicted, PPC, by the fact that his name appeared in column 17 of the report under section 173, CR PC, otherwise, the order of the interim orders was recorded by the counter. Was placed on Sold to the Applicant / Complainant, he indicated that the accused was playing fast and loose with the court process and was not allowing the trial to take place; the accused was adjourned to one defect or another, After being granted bail, the Additional Sessions were used arbitrarily by the judge. In the cases related to the death order, the accused were granted bail against the principles established for the grant of bail, after which they were withdrawn.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
