Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DITTA versus STATE

Section 11 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), after section 204, in a private complaint to the named respondents, dismissed by the trial court as the rejected complainant applicant under section 11 of the Office Zena (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 The IR was listed. , Against three men accused of abducting his daughter, when he was released, when presented to the High Court during the constitutional proceedings, he made one of his free will and married one. He claimed to have agreed to the contract and said that he had left his own home after a dispute with his parents and that no one had abducted his police, recommended to cancel the aforesaid FIR. After recording the abduction statement and the complainant filed a private complaint against the aforesaid, in his statement in the private complaint, the three accused have been abducted. The car, however, introduced a new story molecule in order to stop three other suspects in the case, who were now in need of a summon, also giving contradictory statements as a complaint to the accused and For some people, it was possible for some of the new respondents to make false accusations, at the behest of their father. In view of the contradictory statements of the kidnappers, the purpose of the above cannot be denied, in view of their controversial statements, it cannot be assumed that these cases will be dealt with in a private complaint. Which he had not recovered from. However, according to him, he had confined him to the trial court for about a month, under which circumstances, the defendant proceeded to stand trial. advocate from Shemier lawyer