Disclosure of Sections 154 and 200 Complaints Refusal to prosecute the alleged accused Petitioner Widow, who pleaded innocent and held someone else responsible for her husband's murder, her version / statement under Section 154 Filed a constitutional petition directing Section H to record. The CRPC was recorded by the police on the direction of the High Court applicant and it has been found to be Section HO false in its report under Section 173, the CCP has placed the applicant in column number 2 while the column. The person in No.3 said that right before the proceedings, the applicant had set up a private complaint and a trial court on which the complaint was submitted, the statement of the applicant and his son and daughter were recorded, but the other person / alleged accused. Refused to take action against him, especially because the complaint was filed 3/2 years after the incident and They have a defensive version in which the applicant's version was brought on record and was found to be invalid, showing a delay of approximately 3 1/2 years in filing a complaint and before the end of the prosecution's evidence, It was merely an attempt to stop the trial, there is nothing illegal in the jurisdiction of the review to interfere with the interference of the High Court's bail order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
