A. XXXVII, suits 2 and 3 for the receipt of pro-note money were filed on the basis that the defendant had obtained the suit from the claimant through the claimant's note and the contract process under which he had sued Promised that the proceeds would be paid up to a fixed date, which was not paid by him, the Additional District Judge, justified the litigation and the Additional District Judge properly appreciated the evidence and The improper judgment and decree were correctly reached, concluding that there was no need for any interference with the said judgment and decree, according to the High Court. That is, the explanation is that interest / profits are paid by the lender along with the date of payment at the annual rate of 6% from the date of their payment to the defendant to the date of payment to the defendant. does.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
