Find a Lawyer

MST. GUL FAREEN versus AHMED NAWAZ

Section 5, Schedule and 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for restitution, Appeal against the decision of the Family Court, Section 14 (2) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, useful law Was the making. Spouses and children, but for a month to the extent of Rs 1000 or less, the natural right to appeal the judgment as a maintenance allowance was reduced to such an extent (Rs. 1000 or less) that the wife. And prevent children from getting into trouble. Were considered weak in the structure of society, but beneficial legislation in favor of one party may not be detrimental to the interest of the other party. Except to the extent that the legislature had suffered through the other party, according to his wisdom, he had considered that paying up to 1000 rupees monthly for payment of restitution allowance was not unreasonable for the father, It also lowers its financial status in the society. It can be like the legislature, keeping in mind all citizens, the right of appeal will be returned to the decision-maker when the total amount of restitution allowance sanctioned against it is Rs.1000 per month. Will cross, the present appellate court correctly stated that the partially accepted applicant could not disclose This means that the appellate court had not properly appreciated the evidence or real court by two courts below can not intervene in exceptional constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. top advocates from Khair Pur Mir lawyer