Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AMJAD ANWAR versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL


12, 14 and 65 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 nomination papers were found to be non-matric for the candidates disqualified at the time of submission of nomination because their credentials were not equivalent to matriculation or SSC candidate eligible for competition. There was no Nazim's election, the applicants launched the election petition, which was accepted to the extent that the selection of returning candidates was declared illegal or invalid, but in view of the fact that the applicant / failed candidates. Election Tribunal got 1116 votes while returning candidates got 2730 votes. The most recent elections were announced because the Election Tribunal made progress on the latest election as solid, requiring no interference; in the absence of an error in the unidentified order of the Election Tribunal, the constitutional petition against this order was dismissed. Done,

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Khanpur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.