Find a Lawyer

AKHTAR-UL-ISLAM versus STATE

Sections 9 (c), 20, 21 and 25 Criminal Code (v. 1898), 5 103 Evidence Appraisal Neither a search warrant was obtained nor a female constable charged for the purpose of Section 103 raids. Taken home However, the CCP, in light of its section 25, was not enforceable under the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997 and the provisions of Sections 20 and 21 of the Act, and it was not fatal to their non-compliance prosecution. Was. But the law's directory provisions were designed to provide alert and effective officials guidance. The legislature did not intend to compile the directory provisions of the law and expect negligent, ignorant or incompetent officials to ignore the same allegation unnecessarily in the present case. Expect to flee his house at night, if the investigating officer tried to obtain a search warrant, as there was no means to provide information to the accused. Finding a search warrant can be disregarded, in the event of an emergency, by taking a search warrant and taking a female constable home, but, in keeping with the basic rights of citizens about the family, such non- Minor discounts can only be granted. In very special cases, which were not available in the present case, in any criminal case, only one suspicion, such as the one in the present case, was always considered sufficient to benefit the accused, neither the circumstances nor the proceedings before the rehabilitation. Neither the recovery nor the recovery memo was proven to be true at the time of the recovery, but instead witnesses from two star prosecution best advocate from Chowk Maitla lawyer