SHER MUHAMMAD versus MOMIN KHAN
Sections 17 (2) (i) and (vi) and 24 of the payment of rent and reconstruction of premises by default have evidence on the tenant's eviction record that the landlord suits on the basis of a registered sale deed. Have become the owners of the shops. The landlords, after the purchase of the property, sent a registered notice to the tenants about the change of ownership, payment of future rent and the reconstruction of the enclosed premises, but said the notice remained unresponsive, notwithstanding the notice of ownership change. Neither the rented landlords nor the tenants of the vacant suit premises, under the circumstances, had rightly declared the lessee the lender. , In 1963, had to obtain the necessary approval from the Cantonment Board in connection with the reconstruction and it was not under the law that the landlord should demand the eviction of the tenant. On the basis of the reconstruction, the plan approved in connection with the application for evacuation should be attached if the landlord fails to demolish or renovate the building within a specified period, he or she may be found to be in accordance with section (7). Will expose the results provided below. Under Section 17 of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963, the rent controller had done his work in accordance with the law; Cannot interfere with the search for a rented controller. On appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Lodhran lawyer