Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAQ versus STATE

The appreciation of the Sections 302, 452 and 34 evidence, consistent with the statements made by the prosecution in the two witnesses' testimony, was consistent with their statements that the accused opened fire on his victim, resulting in his death. There was no material contradiction or contradiction in the above statements. The witnesses and their statements were convincing and convincing, and there was no record of denying the medical evidence that, according to the ocular account presented by eye witnesses, the incident occurred in the complainant's home. He was the natural witness. There was previous enmity between the party prosecution, the circumstances proved to be beyond any doubt against the accused, the defense version which was not available when the accused appeared in the relevant time, was unfounded, the case against the accused was dismissed. There was, however, a fair trial and the merits of the imposition of the death sentence that the accused was convicted under Section 2a (a), PPC, but no evidence was available As per requirement 304, the PPC accused was sentenced under section 2302 (b), PPC and sentenced to life imprisonment under section 2302 (b), PPC D Sentenced under act 45452. , PPC will remain intact and will continue to run with both sentences and will also benefit from Section 382B, CR PC. famous lower court advocate from Khyber Agency lawyer