Find a Lawyer

RASHID ALIAS BAOU MASIH versus STATE

Articles 302 (b), 324, 337a (i) and 34 were specifically filed immediately after the definition of evidence, the testimony of the witnesses and the names of the nominees, including their role during the reduction. The event was an unseen event and was not present. On the occasion, the prosecution's witnesses were established beyond any doubt. The location of the injury and the injuries reported by the doctor suggest that the incident occurred at the time given by the prosecutor, and the eye witnesses were consistent with each other about the time. , The place and the way in which the accused injured the witnesses of the accused and the injured prosecutor, none of the witnesses had any previous enmity or animosity that falsely exposed the daylight incident in this case. If involved and the suspects were previously known as prosecution witnesses, the attackers were unlikely to have any luck. There is an FIR filed immediately in these circumstances; the trial is likely to end minor contradictions in the statements of witnesses, on the story of the accused being falsely accused after deliberations. Was made when the presence of other people around the scene of the incident and a few minutes details about its presence could be interpreted from time to time as statements of the prosecution's witnesses were recorded. The prosecutor's story could not be termed fatal because of such contradictions not even after one year after the incident, the ocular account presented by the prosecutor was credible and credible, despite any This cannot be corroborated by any independent piece of evidence famous high court advocate from Thul lawyer